麻豆精选

Martha鈥檚 Rule and NHS Patient Safety

John Tingle argues there is a need to formalise the right of patients and their families/carers to obtain an urgent clinical review, second opinion.

A patient lying in a hospital bed talking to a doctor

Martha鈥檚 Rule is currently a topic of intense discussion and debate. Behind the rule is a sad and tragic story which strikes at the heart of NHS care delivery 鈥 clinical failures and the death of a 13-year-old girl. Reporting the Coroner鈥檚 Inquest proceedings, stated that 鈥淢artha Mills would probably not have died of sepsis if King鈥檚 College hospital doctors had heeded warnings鈥 and moved her to intensive care.

Martha鈥檚 mother, Merope, recounted her experiences and the events that unfolded in a foreword to a by policy think tank . She talks in detail about what happened, her regrets and what should be done to stop the same tragic chain of events happening to other people. Silo thinking, poor interdepartmental relations, and team reputations are among the important issues Merope raises. She recalls being 鈥榯alked to, rather than listened to鈥, how she felt, 鈥榤anaged and condescended to鈥 and, perhaps most devastatingly, how she desperately wishes she had 鈥榝elt able, with no fear of being the target of ill-temper or condescension, to ask for a second opinion from outside the liver team when I became concerned about Martha鈥檚 deterioration鈥.

The patient is always the weaker party in the care equation

Merope鈥檚 powerful testimony illustrates the dynamics of the power relationship that exists between health carers and patients. Doctors, nurses, and other health carers are always going to be in a more powerful position compared to those whom they treat. They have the specialist knowledge and skill that the patient so urgently needs, therefore the patient is always going to be the weaker party. They are ill, in a strange environment, most probably a hospital gown and fearful of what is going to happen next. Conversely the doctor and/or nurse is in their familiar environment.

There are codes of professional practice - , , - alongside other regulatory bodies and of course the law itself, which collectively attempt to redress this power imbalance. The creation of rules, regulations, laws, and codes are one thing; however, the key issue is how all these work together in practice to safeguard patients at ward and other levels. We need to ask ourselves whether patients are adequately protected when it comes to challenging a care decision and seeking more help. I would argue, as Merope does, that they are not. Much more needs to be done to give patients, their relatives, and carers, a firm platform from which to seek more help and to appropriately challenge what is going on if that need arises.

The creation of rules, regulations, laws, and codes are one thing; however, the key issue is how all these work together in practice to safeguard patients at ward and other levels. We need to ask ourselves whether patients are adequately protected when it comes to challenging a care decision and seeking more help.

John Tingle, Birmingham Law School, University 麻豆精选

The NHS needs to do more to develop a patient safety culture

I accept that some degree of error in health care delivery is always going to be inevitable. Nobody is infallible. Health care can be complex and is dependent on human decision making and interaction. What we can do, however, is try and successfully manage risk by developing a proper patient safety culture.

History has not served the NHS well when it comes to patient safety culture development

Unfortunately, the NHS has poor form when it comes to implementing the improvement recommendations made from past patient safety investigations. Patient safety crisis events continue to occur at an alarming rate with often the same or similar errors being repeated. , , are to name but a few of such cases.

In the year 2000 the Department of Health An Organisation with a Memory, a report highlighting major patient safety issues, In 2023 many of those issues are still with us. Hospitals are at various levels of patient safety maturity across the NHS.

The implementation gap

The NHS has a long history of trying to grapple with patient safety issues and not all is doom and gloom. as well as failures. However, the failures do tend to eclipse the successes. We do have a good knowledge of patient safety issues but there is a glaring, 鈥榠mplementation gap鈥. has pointed this out, saying:

鈥淲e consider that a key reason for the persistence of avoidable harm is an 鈥榠mplementation gap鈥 in patient safety in the UK, the difference between what we know improves patient safety and what is done in practice鈥. These words were echoed recently by .

The way forward

The way forward is to adopt the proposals by Demos and Merope Mills. There are good models of doing what is recommended overseas (such as ) and in the (), however, it is clear that there is not yet a sufficiently developed, mature NHS-wide patient safety culture to stop another tragic situation like that of Martha Mills from happening again. We urgently need Martha鈥檚 Rule formally implemented in the NHS. Martha鈥檚 rule does appear to have a groundswell of support from various places and early signs are promising that such a rule .